![]() |
|||||||
|
The Consequences of Migration |
Starter |
Activities |
Classify the Consequences of Migration |
Case Studies of the Consequences of Migration |
Country of Origin (Source) |
Country of Destination (Host) |
|
Positive |
||
Negative |
| Task |
Prepare a model exam answer for either of the following IB Geography exam style questions: With reference to specific examples, examine the advantages of migrations. [12 Marks] With reference to specific examples, examine the disadvantages of migrations. [12 Marks] Advice is answering the advantages of migration exam question: Responses should consider the advantages at both the point of origin of migrations and the final destinations for voluntary and involuntary migrations. These would include, at the origin, factors such as the income derived from remittances and the alleviation of poverty, and the reduction in population pressures and in the demand for resources. At the destinations, the advantages could include higher (or regular) incomes for the migrants and, for the host populations, the availability of labour that carries lower costs and is often unregulated. Reference could also be made to advantages derived from cultural mixing (art, foodstuffs, etc.). The advantages of forced migrations would be for the migrants alone: the provision of food and shelter and of security (either short term or for a longer period). Up to [2 marks] will be given to appropriate, developed examples. The remaining [10 marks] will not necessarily have to be allocated evenly between the origin and destination. These marks will be allocated according to the markband, which can be found below. Advice is answering the disadvantages of migration exam question: Responses should consider the disadvantages at both the point of origin of migrations and the final destinations for voluntary and involuntary migrations. These would include, at the origin, factors such loss of human resources, communities and regions drawn into vicious circles of decline and the premature ageing of a population due to the emigration of younger people. At the destinations, the disadvantages could include pressure on food supplies, housing, jobs, and services, discrimination against immigrants and the predominance of males leading to social problems. Up to [2 marks] will be given to appropriate, developed examples. The remaining [10 marks] will not necessarily have to be allocated evenly between the origin and destination. These marks will be allocated according to the markband, which can be found below. |
Marks |
Overall Quality |
Factual Knowledge |
Examples/Case Studies |
Terminology |
Analysis/Evaluation |
0-1 |
Does not meet any recognised criterion > very poor. | No relevant facts > contains few facts that are relevant. | None > irrelevant. | None appropriate > very low level. | No evidence of analysis > very little attempt at analysis. |
2-3 |
Inadequate > Weak, unsupported generalizations. | Very limited knowledge > Some knowledge but superficial or inaccurate. | Inappropriate and/or inaccurate. | None/little attempt to organize material. | Weak > Some attempt but much inaccurate or invalid. |
4-6 |
Acceptable but generalized > Good. | Mostly basic but accurate. | Superficial and underdeveloped > Appropriate but generalized. | Some indication of structure and organization of material. | Some analysis but seldom focusing on relevant material > generally acceptable covering some of the important aspects. |
7-10 |
Very good > Excellent, showing depth understanding and insight. | Accurate, specific knowledge showing some depth. > Knowledge applied consistently with depth. | Appropriate but not always developed > Specific and developed. | Terminology usually sound, good structure. > Clear and accurate terminology, very good structure and organization. | Good, detailed analysis, good attempt at evaluation > Very good, reasoned, justified and thoughtful evaluations. |
Review |
Integration of Immigrants: A challenge for Europe - A Video from the European Commission |
|
|